Association between socioeconomic status and hospitalisation requirement in older patients attended at the emergency department: A retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: A low socioeconomic status (SES) has been associated with poor health results. The present study aimed to investigate if SES of older patients attending the emergency department is associated with the use of healthcare resources and outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Observational, retrospective study including consecutive patients 65 years or older admitted to the emergency department. Variables at baseline, index episode, and follow-up were recorded. SES was measured using an indirect theoretical index and patients were categorised into two groups according to whether they lived in a neighbourhood with a low or high SES. Primary outcomes included hospitalisation after the emergency department visit and prolonged hospitalisation (>7 days) at index episode. Secondary outcomes included emergency department re-consultant and hospital admission in the following 3 months after the index episode, and all-cause mortality after long-term follow-up. Logistic regression and cumulative hazards regression models were used to investigate associations between SES and outcomes. RESULTS: The cohort included 553 patients (80 years [73-85], 50.5% female, 55.9% with low SES). After the emergency department visit, 234 patients (42.3%) required hospital admission. A low SES was inversely associated with hospitalisation with an adjusted odds ratio=0.654 (95% CI 0.441-0.970). Among hospitalised patients, a low SES was associated with prolonged hospitalisation (adjusted odds ratio=2.739; 95% CI 1.470-5.104). Follow-up outcomes, including all-cause mortality, were not associated with SES. CONCLUSIONS: Older patients living in more deprived urban areas were hospitalised less often after emergency department care, but hospital stays were longer. Understanding the effect of social determinants in healthcare use is mandatory to tailor resources to patient needs.

Epidemiological aspects, clinical management and short-term outcomes in elderly patients diagnosed with acute heart failure in the emergency department in Spain: results of the EDEN-34 study.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incidence of acute heart failure (AHF) diagnosis in elderly patients in emergency departments (ED), diagnostic confirmation in hospitalized patients, and short-term adverse events. METHODS: All patients aged ≥65 years attended in 52 Spanish EDs during 1 week were included and those diagnosed with AHF were selected. In hospitalized patients, those diagnosed with AHF at discharge were collected. As adverse events, in-hospital and 30-day mortality, and combined adverse event (death or hospitalization) at 30 days post-discharge were collected. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) for association of demographic variables, baseline status and constants at ED arrival with mortality and 30-day post-discharge adverse event were calculated. RESULTS: We included 1,155 patients with AHF (annual incidence: 26.5 per 1000 inhabitants ≥65 years, 95% CI: 25.0-28.1). In 86% the diagnosis of AHF was known at discharge. Overall 30-day mortality was 10.7% and in-hospital mortality was 7.9%, and the combined event in 15.6%. In-hospital and 30-day mortality was associated with arterial hypotension (adjusted OR: 74.0, 95% CI: 5.39-1015. and 42.6, 3.74-485, respectively and hypoxemia (2.14, 1.27-3.61; and 1.87, 1.19-2.93) on arrival at the ED and requiring assistance with ambulation (2.24, 1.04-4.83; and 2.48, 1.27-4.86) and age (per 10-year increment; 1.54, 1.04-2.29; and 1.60, 1.13-2.28). The combined post-discharge adverse event was not associated with any characteristic. CONCLUSIONS: AHF is a frequent diagnosis in elderly patients consulting in the ED. The functional impairment, age, hypotension and hypoxemia are the factors most associated with mortality.

Influence of clinical and immunological parameters on the health-related quality of life of patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) in patients with primary SS patients using the SF-36 questionnaire and to analyse the association between the main clinical features and the SF-36 scales. METHODS: We studied 110 patients (105 women and 5 men, mean age of 56 years) with primary SS seen consecutively in the outpatient clinic of our Department. We used the population-based reference values for the Spanish version of the SF-36 health survey as control values for a healthy population. RESULTS: Comparison between patients with primary SS and the control population showed lower scores in all SF-36 scales (p < 0.001). Analysis of the SF-36 scales by gender showed a significant correlation between age and the values for physical functioning (p = 0.013) and bodily pain (p = 0.016) scores. No significant differences in SF-36 scores were found when comparing patients according to the presence or absence of sicca features. Women with vaginal dryness had lower scores for social functioning (61.9 vs. 74.4) and general health (37.2 vs. 44.7) than those without, although the differences were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Patients with extraglandular involvement had lower scores for the vitality scale (40.8 vs. 54.5 p = 0.007), social functioning (67.0 vs. 79.8, p = 0.010), bodily pain (49.5 vs. 62.5, p = 0.018) and general health (38.6 vs. 49.4 p = 0.001) than those without. CONCLUSION: Patients with primary SS had clearly lower HR-QoL scores than the healthy population; with significantly lower scores in all SF-36 scales and in both summary measures. We identified several epidemiological and clinical SS features related to these lower SF-36 scores. Age at protocol correlated with physical functioning and bodily pain. Vaginal dryness was the sicca feature that most affected the HR-QoL of female SS patients, and a poor HR-QoL was also observed in those patients with a systemic expression of the disease, with pulmonary involvement being the extraglandular manifestation that most contributed to a poor HR-QoL. Our results highlight the importance of earlier diagnostic and therapeutic management of patients with primary SS, which, together with a close follow-up, may contribute to a significant improvement in their HR-QoL.

Life-threatening isopropyl alcohol intoxication: is hemodialysis really necessary?

Isopropyl alcohol (IPA) is widely used in industrial and home-cleaning products, easily available to general public and inexpensive: intoxications can occur unintentionally, in suicide attempts or by alcohol abusers as a substitute for ethanol. Symptoms involve the gastrointestinal tract, central nervous system and at high doses cardiovascular manifestations may appear. Ketonemia, ketonuria without hyperglicemia or acidosis and elevated osmol gap are common laboratory findings. Mortality and morbidity is low, but some fatal cases have been reported in patients in deep coma and especially those with hypotension. We present a life-threatening intoxication, with deep coma and hypotension, treated successfully with hemodialysis. Whether hemodialysis must always be performed is a controversial question. Our opinion is hemodialysis is not needed, even in life-threatening situations. Arguments about this opinion are presented.